I saw this topic on my way out of RCB.
I assume the writer was saying something else like if a government is going to get indicted by the ICC for quelling a riot how then may that government legally snuff out a riot without attracting a warrant of arrest?
I found this : http://www.answers.com/topic/riot for Mr. Fix it.
He might want to read about the various definitions of riots. He should pay great attention to the meaning of 'Police Riot'.
Note also that the establishment likes to use the word 'riot' and not for nothing. 'Riot' is a an offence for which clearly spelt out sentences exist in all countries. Organizers of such gatherings on the other hand like to use the word 'protest'. Again this is not for nothing either. Protesters are a protected lot by law.
So usually the government would first convert any peaceful protest in to a riot then feel 'justified' to quash it. However since this tactic is now known, it constitutes an offence to give orders to attack peaceful protesters.
Monday, July 13, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment